Goal: 完善生活

简体:平等金钱系统只会允许无偏见的记录和报导事件和历史,以从事件当中学习为出发点,以完善全体的生活为目标,教育人们并谨慎细致地调查:人类作为一个群体如何可以最好地与彼此和地球上的所有其它生物共存。 繁體:平等金錢系統只會允許無偏見的記錄和報導事件和歷史,以從事件當中學習為出發點,以完善全體的生活為目標,教育人們並謹慎細緻地調查:人類作為一個群體如何可以最好地與彼此和地球上的所有其它生物共存。

I like this Goal and agree 100%

979 people voted on this goal

974 agrees
5 disagrees

32 people left a comment:

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "right on !"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "1"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "1"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "1"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "I like this Goal and agree 100% "
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "good"
I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "This i love. Who wants to live in the digust of our anchesters. Mine were nothing but convicts,, robbers, mainly jailed in my time. It sill haunts me. Give us a break . "
I do not like this Goal and Suggest Rather the Following… on
Comment: "humans at this point are unable to be unbiased"

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

With ‘biased’ we refer to the changing and misrepresenting of information in a way that distorts the reality with the intent to place a certain individual or group of individuals in a position of advantage or disadvantage. Different individuals will still give a different perspective on the same point, event or topic – which is necessary to ensure that all angles and points are considered when we, for instance, try to learn from past mistakes - this is constructive. Distorting information in a way to manipulate public consensus is not.

Furthermore, the transparency of all record-keeping will allow for extensive cross-referencing, which will ensure that no individual or group of individuals is able to misinterpret and misrepresent information as fact.

I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "who gets to define perfect? wording is very important when we are deciding things on this scale. I mean it's fine to gloss over things with friends, they know what you mean. On a mass scale it's different. We have to be very clear. When you call something perfect your setting everything that isn't it, in opposition to it cuz, it's now not perfect"

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

Perfecting life is not a concept based on ideas and opinions - it stands within common sense that perfecting life implies minimising harm to the utmost, creating a society of harmony, mutual trust, respect, cooperation and consideration in which each individual has the opportunity, the resources and the support to develop their expression and skills to the most effective levels. The goal of perfecting life therefore means striving for everything and everyone to exist in the best possible way and to not accept anything less than the best possible option. The meaning of 'perfection' in itself is yet to be discovered as we have always ever compromised ourselves due to limited and unequal resource distribution. Therefore, defining and living perfection will be a process that will be specified and fine-tuned as we progress within the process of bettering life on Earth.

I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "You're conflating 'reporting' with 'learning.' There's a difference between facts and the analysis of those facts, so you can't have 'learning' as the starting point - I guess its the end point."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

As stated in the goal, 'learning' will be the starting-point - facilitated through reporting - and thus it will automatically also be the end-point. Your starting-point and your end-point will always be equal and the same - this is why we can learn from our mistakes, as our end-point as consequence will indicate a problem in our starting-point.

I do not like this Goal and Suggest Rather the Following… on
Comment: "Unbiased recordkeeping is not only odious but impossible. Every event includes every other event, and every other perspective therein that provided the grounding for that event. Protecting life for all is impossible, as life survives by eating life - even were one to ban the consumption of animal life, the consumption of vegetable life must continue. This is then prejudice against certain forms of life because they lack certain levels of 'advancement' or 'similarity' to human life. This position does not understand the nature of life."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

"With ‘biased’ we refer to the changing and misrepresenting of information in a way that distorts the reality with the intent to place a certain individual or group of individuals in a position of advantage or disadvantage. Different individuals will still give a different perspective on the same point, event or topic – which is necessary to ensure that all angles and points are considered when we, for instance, try to learn from past mistakes - this is constructive. Distorting information in a way to manipulate public consensus is not."

Furthermore, the transparency of all record-keeping will allow for extensive cross-referencing, which will ensure that no individual or group of individuals is able to misinterpret and misrepresent information as fact.

An EMS does not propose that we should starve to death to prevent the deaths of other beings – it is simply not possible. Of course we will have to eat, and we will eat whatever our bodies require in order to function and be satisfied. What the EMS does propose is that the food industry is no longer based on profit, but rather on support which would mean that food will no longer be a “product” to be sold for profit (which demands the existence of a low-expenditure, high-profit manufacturing process) but will be that which is determined to be beneficial to consume in order to live and function optimally. This means that animals will not be bred and live out their lives in factory farms, as the demand for meat will decrease (initial indications are that meat is only required once or twice a week for a human, or even less – this point will need to be investigated without bias). Large farms for vegetables and grains will be practical in most cases – this will also be tested and determined without the driving influence of profit overshadowing every aspect of the process. The position of the EMS understands the nature of life as that which is required to sustain life is all that is necessary, and anything more is simply unnecessary – contrary to the current reality of capitalism wherein the planet and its resources are being consumed without regard for the consequences.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "Wow"
I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "As everyone has biases and cannot be completely objective, there would need to be equal representation of groups, particularly both genders, and several layers of people/advisory boards reviewing the record-keeping and reporting, or just old-fashioned true freedom of the press like we used to have!"

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

The biased quality of our current system exists due to how money has become a decisive factor within the integrity that individuals are supposed to hold – money and power have overridden common sense, where personal interests are pondered over the best interest of the collective and our acceptance and allowance of such abusive abilities to exist within the inherent rules and regulations that our current monetary system is functioning on.
 
Therefore, removing the fear-factor will make a huge difference in terms of unbiased record-keeping diminishing to a great extent.. However, to ensure objectivity - all record-keeping will be transparent and all movement of information will be publicly available for everyone’s review. This allows points of information to be cross-referenced by various individuals from within different backgrounds/contexts and areas of expertise – to ensure that record-keeping is not tainted by one individual or group of individuals and all angles have been covered.

I do not like this Goal and Suggest Rather the Following… on
Comment: "There is no world that is best for each one. When you look at the opposite poles of our society today, there will always be one side that will be unhappy. In today's society, the lazy people that don't want to work and want to have everything handed to them are unhappy because of our capitalistic system. Everyone has the chance to achieve whatever they want if they are willing to work for it. In the society you speak of where everything is redistributed so everyone has an equal share, there is no incentive to do great things because what you achieve will be taken from you and given to others. That is not human nature. People excel when they have something to work for. Right now the idea of American Exceptionalism is a hot topic. This country is special because we have a system where ANYONE can be exceptional. The only limitations they have on them is the ones they place on themselves. I will say I admire the fact that you are working on this as a private organization, not through the government. That is how change needs to be effected for those that need help. There are so many private individuals and organizations out there to help others. Giving the money to government to run social programs for us is insane. The Wall Street guys are crooks...so don't give your money to them. But Washington is just as bad, and it doesnt matter what party is in power. Let the private citizens and organizations do the work."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

There is currently no such thing as ‘equal opportunity’ existent anywhere within the world – it’s an idea which gets promoted to make people who do have a job/income feel good about themselves because apparently they have ‘achieved something’ – while at the same time providing an excuse/justification as to why we should not care about those who are less fortunate in their financial position because apparently they are in this position ‘by their own doing’ and ‘if they would only work harder they could have what I have’. All of this together, allows for a mind-set that does not question reality and where one will simply go along with how things currently operate. This idea is however only a belief used to promote/defend the current economic system, and is not how things actually operate.

Ask yourself:

• Does a person born into a family with very little resources have the same opportunity as someone born into a rich family?
• Has a child who will die of malnutrition by the age of 5 have equal opportunity to someone born into a family which does not have to worry about bringing food on the table?
• Does someone born with a disability have the same opportunity as someone who hasn’t?
• Has someone who cannot afford an education have the same opportunity as someone who’s education is paid for by his/her parents?
• Does everyone have equal opportunity to have an income/job when our very economic system isn’t designed to provide full-employment in the first place?
The current system wants you to believe that you are special and that you have achieved something for yourself because then you won’t question it – which ensures the continued existence/survival of the system. The system however operates in a way where a few hold the majority of the resources at the expense of the many. Our economic system favours those with money over those with no money – your whole life is pretty much defined by how much money you have / are born into. Once in a while someone live the ‘rags to riches’ story – these cases are exceptional but glorified within the media to promote the idea that ‘anyone can make it’ and giving people a sense of hope – while this hope is completely ungrounded.

Suggest to more closely investigate the economic nature of reality and question your beliefs about our current system.

I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "How would one ensure this unbiased record keeping is my question?"

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

When the principle of the system is supporting, enabling and promoting the optimum well being of living beings on Earth, biased record keeping would stand as a detrimental aspect to the functioning of the system, since records can only be kept as a way to evaluate and project the optimization of all fields and activities that make the system sustainable.

Hence, ourselves as human beings understanding the principle of Equality, any biased intention won't be able to be kept as within common sense, anything that deviates from the common principle of what is best for all will immediately be re-evaluated to verify its accuracy and relevancy within any form of record keeping. There is no point in promoting or supporting anything or anyone in specific or with special-considerations other than the basic principle and foundation of the system aforementioned.

I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "I don't believe unbiased is possible. Perhaps we should have a process that seeks to eliminate bias by inviting people to notice it, and correcting it when we find it."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

That is definitely a good idea and a point to be included in Education:
Learning to identify bias, learning to recognize how bias is created/formed and what purposes it serves = self-interest, identity in separation from life as a whole, favoritism etc., within this also supporting in fact fear of each-other and thus the entire human-RACE competition system, as we can see in all systems of our world.

Within an equal money system, the objective is to educate ourselves and each-other into practically restoring the value of LIFE within and as ourselves, and consequently within how we interact with each-other and how we approach things in our reality.

Establishing systems that are based on this value of life as Best for All, showing that an unbiased and equal support for all life is possible: will also assist the human being to realize that what we call ´human nature´ has been the result of conditioning through a system of abuse that´s only been interested in profit, not life; and that therefore ´human nature´ can (with the support of life equality systems) be changed, through acknowledging self-responsibility and self-realizing life as oneness and equality, within this slowly but surely eliminating bias and thus eliminating FEAR, which has been the basic reason why the system was able to control and abuse the human, exploiting life for profit.

Imagine a world without fear – it would be a world without bias. It is no easy task, as it implies the deprogramming of lifetimes of conditioning – yet it is possible. We are able to create a new destiny for humanity, the tools are here, the knowledge/understanding is here, the means/technology is here – it is now up to us. Are we Here? When we realize we are Here, we can see our responsibility is Here – therefore it is to make of our Here what is best for all. That is the starting-point of an equal money system.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "Es demasiado ambicioso, pero interesante."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

La perfección de vida implica todo un proceso de educación que se ha comenzado ya en adultos que podamos comenzar a generar puntos de apoyo para caminar este proceso de perfección como individuos que consideran en todo momento alinear sus vidas al principio de vida en igualdad. Esto se hará de generación en generación, ya que es claro ver que el condicionamiento para actuar en interés propio tiene que ser corregido mediante una intensiva participación de padres hacia hijos, de esta manera entendiendo que la perfección existe cuando todo individuo es considerado como igual y obteniendo cuanto requiere para vivir dignamente de la misma manera – la perfección no será ya un estándar social remunerado por dinero, sino parte de los fundamentos de vida para únicamente aceptarnos ser aquello que sea mejor para todos como iguales, valorándonos unos a otros como la vida.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "I like the idea,but as always caution as to who runs it,controls,or manipulates?"

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

In today’s world information is controlled and manipulated by the Media to affect change so that certain individuals can gain power and control which results in money. An example is for instance the War in Iraq where it was said that Iraq had WMD and that is why America invaded. Yet most now know it was about the oil – it was about gaining power in the form of oil which is money. But the real reason was suppressed – because if the truth comes out - power/money and control is compromised. Yet within this scenario the truth of what created this war will not become part of our history books as this information is not acceptable to be published as the truth.

In the equal money system - money will not be a factor, which also takes the power factor out – nobody can be more than another. There is no other secret motive behind Record keeping and Reporting of Events and History, because it is from the starting point of learning from Events with the Goal of Perfecting Life for All. This means that records will be kept as it is and as it happened – no secrets.

Thus creating an effective database that is monitored by peers to create an effective source of information aimed and focused on perfecting life.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "here, here!"
I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "As far as we mean biased, we mean that the information about something have been influenced by something which is not in the source of information. Storing of information is physical, so we never realy can be certain about how much the storing is influenced by something from the outside. We can only reduce uncertainty and reduce possibility of errors, though in principle we cant reach completely unbiaced, completely uncertain, and not even if we have unified all the known universe, because its based on interactions, which we have seen, and by logic, we can see that there is an above informational structure which would influence stuff which we cant influence, and we dont know how this "above" structure might change. By above structure, i mean whatever which has a stronger influence on a thing we have discovered and the thing has a lesser influence on this above sturcture. This means, we always have to have some belief but it always must be temporal. However, Logic so far is a basic component, even if we have belief, its based on logic: "that is, i believe that cooperation is good" that implies that "IF i meet with something which is cooperation, THEN i consider it good" This is some conductive logic, and it is a basic element of logic. However, here i dont say that belief contains all of the elements of logic. Belief is usually, when we accept something inconclusive as true or false, or also belief is when we have a logical error, and might erronously determine a statement as being either true, false or uncertain. So, i believe people should cooperate without suffering."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

As you have so effectively deduce where a belief exists, there is a LIE that must be accepted that is greater than yourself to justify why perfection is impossible and so we are at root cause in creating this through religions that are basically only the self accepted philosophy that are functioning within a limited range of available understanding.

Once all is known, we will noticed that perfection is always possible. Thus, realize that all is known, we just don't know it yet. For this, study the Equality Equation and when you truly grasp it, you'll noticed that nothing is never unknown or unknowable as everything that have been and is and will be is always based on its interconnectedness as relationships and that nothing exists in separation.

Therefore, the separation we impose, through the knowledge of good and evil are always our deliberate action to influence the relationships in the name of our own self interest.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "支持!"
I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "This can happen, but only if everybody in society is totally equal. It can't happen were there is any form of incentive to take power and/or control over another part, then it WILL be distorted again."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

Yes, this is indeed so. Within the development of the Equal Money System we realize that, in order to stop history from repeating itself ad nauseum – until our eventual self-destruction and annihilation from this planet altogether - we must in fact stop all the power games, both within ourselves as well as within this system as a whole, which have exploited and wreaked havoc on this world since time immemorial.

We see clearly that the only way to dignify life here is through ensuring that all are provided for in an equal manner wherein no one has entitlement over another, but all are considered and regarded within a system that reflects actual care for our neighbors and thus honors life on Earth, once and for all, in both a practical and fully supportive and functional way.

This have never been done before, as there has always been a point of control, whether directly/indirectly that has eventually sabotaged our ability to create a world that is best for each one. Thus, within the Equal Money System the only incentive will be to work together as self-willed equals to produce the most optimal living possible here, which will reflect a real democracy where each one is a vote that is counted and nothing will be implemented until each voice is heard.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "Agree"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "That will be a much welcomed change, as learning from mistakes is not practiced in the current system. It is now "whoever wins the war re-writes the history". "
I do not like this Goal and Suggest Rather the Following… on
Comment: "Perfect resemblance of Nazi Germany."

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

Disagreeing upon historical stigmas is not a valid argument here. We can only assume that you disagreeing with it has to do with the social conditioning through the past as an excuse to not partake in the actual work required to ensure that Perfecting Life is a task taken on by each individual’s everyday living activity. Suggest that you expand your argument to see where the actual disagreement With the Goal-itself is existent.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "We are one but not the same!! The most important thing that life needs... comes from Mother Earth and from Outside Mother earth!!!"
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "so... I suggest the permaculture model, in that all life is contained in a closed loop. The for profit system only externalizes loss and leaves hazards lying around like abandoned land mines and carcinogenic chemicals, etc etc."
I do not like this Goal and Suggest Rather the Following… on
Comment: ""will allow only unbiased record keeping and reporting of events", I believe there are a few problems with this stance;- humans do not have a hive mind, even though one could be imagined, and although we must always seek to 'advance the collective', imposing a lowest common denominator standard on this directive, conflicts with the fact that human beings have subjective perspectives and diminishes the articulation and wealth these views might imbue. The news today is full of reporting that has no interpretation, and what is the effect of this? Lack of consideration and accountability, of course bias has three reactions- agreement, disagreement and discussion; the complete removal of bias removes all three of these things and treats people like cogs and not people who can be responsible for a subjective epistemology. I believe the essence of perfecting life does not lie in removing peoples freedoms to have views, its giving them the tools to develop an intellectual mouth (that knows how to chew, digest and spit). SO lets avoid sowing the mouth closed... "

Brand_logo Equal Money Team Response:

With ‘biased’ we refer to the changing and misrepresenting of information in a way that distorts the reality with the intent to place a certain individual or group of individuals in a position of advantage or disadvantage. Different individuals will still give a different perspective on the same point, event or topic – which is necessary to ensure that all angles and points are considered when we, for instance, try to learn from past mistakes - this is constructive. Distorting information in a way to manipulate public consensus is not.

I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "altough we have to consider what has happened before the EMS and point out that all man-made historic recodrs till here are apparently made biased. yet because we cannot erase them should be careful with investingating it."
I like this Goal But would like to add… on
Comment: "its not that simple....."
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "Educating people on the human condition from strictly a scientific standpoint will be the only way for this to happen in my opinion. "
I like this Goal and agree 100% on
Comment: "perhaps to add that through this media and documentation will change drastically to a real-life approach, unwavered by the current fears of job-loss, money-loss or discrimination."

Become an Activist for Life and Global Transformation